Skip to content
Client login

Free Audit

Digital marketing

Facebook ads: what they actually produce, and the hour that follows

Here a Facebook campaign produces messages, not orders. And the cost per message means nothing if nobody answers.

Published on 5 July 2026 — Algeria Agency

Facebook advertising is the first marketing spend for most Algerian businesses, and often the only one. It is also the worst measured, not for want of tools but because everybody looks at the wrong figure.

What a campaign produces here, in the overwhelming majority of cases, is neither an order nor a visit to a site: it is a message. And a message is a person waiting, with a question, for a length of time you decide without thinking about it.

Everything else — the targeting, the creative, the budget — comes after that sentence. An excellent campaign pouring forty messages into an inbox nobody opens before the next morning is still an excellent campaign, and an entirely wasted spend.

This article will give you no cost per result: no dated, checkable series exists for this market. It gives you the real mechanism, the two figures that matter, and what we refuse to launch even when the budget is ready.

What a campaign actually produces here: messages

In most countries a campaign is judged on orders taken on a site. Here the dominant path is different and worth describing as it is: the ad appears in the feed, the person does not leave the application, and they write.

That is not a failure of maturity, it is the shortest path and it works. But it changes the nature of what you are buying: not a transaction but a conversation somebody has to hold, in a language and a tone that represent you.

A campaign therefore has an internal cost nobody budgets: the time of the person who answers. Forty messages a day are not free, they are a part-time job, and it is that part-time job which decides whether the advertising pays.

The consequence for the objective: a campaign optimised for messages will bring messages, including from people who write "price?" and never reply. That is normal, it counts in the cost per accepted order, and it should not be treated as a betrayal by the platform.

Before spending anything, answer one question in writing: who replies, between which hours, and what they say when they do not know. Without those three answers, everything after this section is decoration.

The largest audience, and what that really implies

Start with the scale, because it is regularly invoked as an argument when it is in fact a constraint.

According to figures published by DataReportal for Algeria, Facebook remains the most used platform with 25.6 million users, ahead of TikTok at 21.1 million and Instagram at 12 million.

The usual reading is immediate: "so we have to be on Facebook". It is true and it is useless, because your competitors read exactly the same table and draw exactly the same conclusion, in the same quarter.

The reading that matters is the other one: the largest audience is also the least segmented and the most contested. Everybody is there, so the attention you are buying is attention others are bidding on, and its price is set by them rather than by you.

The practical consequence is unpopular: being on the largest platform is not an advantage, it is a starting point. The advantage lies in the hour after the message — which is exactly where your competitors are contesting nothing.

Users by platform in Algeria
  • Facebook25.6M
  • TikTok21.1M
  • Instagram12M

DataReportal, Digital 2026 Algeria — October 2025 figures

"Boost" is not a campaign

The button under the post is the default path, and it is the most expensive per result obtained. It was designed to be easy rather than to be effective, and that difference is written nowhere.

It optimises for what looks like success: reactions, comments, shares. Those three can be had cheaply from people who will never buy, and they produce a satisfying screenshot rather than a sale.

A campaign built in the ads manager lets you state what you actually want: a message, a call, an order. The platform then goes looking for the people who do that thing, and they are a different population from the ones who react.

The gap shows within a week. A boosted post gets three hundred reactions and four messages; the same amount with a message objective often gets forty, with far fewer reactions and a less flattering report.

The button is not useless for all that: it serves to show information to people who already follow you — an opening, a change of hours, an item out of stock. The mistake is using it to acquire customers.

The real bottleneck is not the cost per message, it is the hour that follows

The cost per message is the figure you will be shown. It is real, it is useful, and it is only the second most important one on this page.

The first is the share of messages handled within the hour. A message answered the next day converts far less than one answered while the person still has their phone in hand, and that difference costs nothing in advertising.

So write the rule as an operating instruction rather than an intention: a named person, a range of hours, and a standard first reply containing the price, the availability and the delivery time. That first reply matters more than the creative.

If nobody can hold that range, the honest decision is not to launch the campaign. It is the refusal the pillar article states and the one most often ignored, because an advertising budget is easier to authorise than a person’s time.

And measure the queue: for one week, count each evening how many messages had been waiting more than an hour. That number predicts your results better than any change of targeting, and it is counted in a notebook.

The comments under the ad are the ad

Nobody buys on the creative alone. People open the comments and read them, and what is there was written by strangers, by unhappy customers and sometimes by your competitors.

Three things happen there and all three are repaired for nothing. Somebody asks the price and nobody answers, so the next reader assumes there is a reason. Somebody complains about a delivery and nobody answers, so the next reader believes them. And a competitor leaves their own number, sometimes very politely.

The rule is therefore simple: whoever runs the ads answers the comments, in the same hours. Not another team and not later: the comment and the message are one conversation, held in public in one case and in private in the other.

Hiding a comment is a narrow tool: insults, and numbers left by competitors. Hiding a genuine question costs more than the question, because the next reader will see that an answer is missing without knowing which one.

And here is the free habit almost nobody applies: answer the price question in public, with the price. It looks like a gift to the competition; in reality it removes half the messages that were never going anywhere, and that half was costing time.

Cash on delivery is the leak the ads manager cannot show

The ads manager gives you a cost per message or per registered order. It cannot tell you what happens at the customer’s door, and that is precisely where the leak is.

If some of the parcels come back refused, your real cost is the budget divided by the accepted orders, not by the registered ones. The gap between those two numbers is large enough to overturn the conclusion of a campaign you believed was profitable.

The direction of the market, meanwhile, is dated: over one year the number of online merchants grew 26%, card transactions on the internet 38%, and the amount paid online 179%, while the card base grew only 9%.

The useful reading is in the gap between the last figure and the other three: the cards already existed, what is changing is usage. Paying before dispatch is no longer an exotic request, and an order paid in advance is an order that cannot be refused at a door.

What we advise and what we refuse: offer prepayment as an option with a small advantage rather than as an obligation, and measure the cost per accepted order for a month before touching the targeting. We refuse to optimise a campaign whose acceptance rate nobody has counted.

One-year growth, by indicator
  • Cards in circulation9%
  • Online merchants26%
  • Internet transactions38%
  • Amount paid online179%

GIE Monétique, 2025 annual balance sheet

Narrow targeting exhausts itself in a few days

Fine targeting is what sells best, because it resembles precision and tells well in a meeting. In a market this size it often produces the opposite of what it promises.

An audience defined by two or three interests amounts here to a few tens of thousands of people. Even a modest daily budget then shows the same ad to the same people within days: frequency climbs, results fall, and the report calls it "audience fatigue" as though it were weather.

The answer that works more often here is counter-intuitive: a broad audience and a creative that filters. You let the platform find the buyers instead of guessing them on its behalf, and the pool does not run dry after a week.

Narrow targeting stays right in two cases. The first is a genuinely local business, where geography is the whole filter. The second is a re-engagement audience built on your own list or on your site’s visitors — that is, on people you already know.

The check is one line of the report: look at the frequency. Above three or four for a small budget, you are paying to repeat yourself, and no creative corrects that — the audience is simply smaller than the money you are putting into it.

What you own and what you rent

The page, the ad account, the measurement tag and the customer list have to be in your name, with a company email address. The pillar article says why; here a local aggravation is added, and it recurs every week.

A page created by an employee from their personal account leaves with them. There is no quick procedure for getting it back, and what is lost is not the page but years of conversations and the history that was lowering your costs.

The history in the ad account is in fact the only asset that accumulates in this spend. Left with a supplier, it stays with them: you are not changing supplier, you are starting from zero, and the price of that restart is written on no contract.

The part nobody mentions is the conversations. Years of customer relationship live in a messaging inbox you cannot usefully export. What you can do is put the essentials somewhere else: a name, a number, what was bought.

Hence a free habit: every closed sale produces one line in a file you own, with a number and what was ordered. That list will outlive the page, and on the day an account is restricted without explanation it is the only audience you have left.

The creative: sound off, vertical, price visible

Your ad is seen with no sound, in a feed, by a moving thumb, on a phone held at arm’s length. The first second decides everything after it, and vertical format is not a fashion but the shape of the screen.

The text in the image has to fit in a thumbnail and in the language your buyer thinks in. The shortest words win, and one line in French followed by one line in Arabic works better than a sentence attempting both at once.

Then the price. A hidden price produces the largest number of messages and the lowest closing rate: it is a way of buying conversations you are going to lose. Showing a price filters, and filtering is exactly what you want to pay for.

There is finally an omission specific to this market: an ad showing a product without saying where it ships from or how long it takes to arrive. Those two lines clear more objections than any slogan, and they cost nothing to add.

The test is free: look at your own ad on your phone, sound off, at normal distance. If you cannot tell in two seconds what it is, what it costs and how to get it, no budget will repair that.

What can be measured, and the attribution that will mislead you

The platform’s report is honest about what it measures, and what it measures is its own work. It does not claim to know whether you were paid, and it should not be blamed for a claim it never made.

Your figures are elsewhere, and there are four: messages received, the share handled within the hour, orders accepted, and the origin of each sale — asked of the customer rather than inferred from a table.

Attribution will mislead you and it is better to know how. Somebody sees the ad on Monday on their phone, writes on Thursday from another device, or walks straight into your shop. The platform claims what it can see, and the shop visit belongs to nobody.

That is why the question "where did you see us", asked at the counter, is worth more than any dashboard. It costs one sentence, it is imperfect, and it is the only measurement that crosses devices and weeks.

And we will quote no cost per result for Algeria here: we know of no dated, checkable series. The foreign benchmarks in the budget article serve to understand a shape — which sectors cost more than others — never an amount, and their source line says which market they come from.

What to check before signing

The first question is about the accounts: are the page and the ad account in your name, and will they stay with you at the end? Ask for administrator access before the first invoice rather than for a clause in a contract.

The second is about the objective: which one will be used, and why that one. A supplier who answers "engagement" for an acquisition campaign has just answered the question, and the answer is no.

The third is about the figure reported each month and where it comes from. Ask explicitly for the cost per accepted order: the real information is whether they know how to compute it and whether they agree to track it.

The fourth is about comments and messages: who answers them, in which hours, and with what first reply. If the answer is "the client", that is an acceptable answer — provided it is written down and the client has agreed to it.

The fifth is a test, and in this particular case the right answer is almost a set phrase: ask what they would refuse to do. "I would refuse to launch before somebody is answering within the hour" is the answer of a supplier who has already watched a campaign fail for that reason.

What we do, and what we will refuse to do

What we will refuse: launching a message campaign for a business that cannot answer within the hour during the hours the ads run. We say so before the quotation, while it still costs us a project, because after that it only costs the client.

We will refuse to sell the boost button as an acquisition method, and to build narrow interest targeting on a small budget in a market this size. Those are the two easiest things to sell on this page.

We will refuse to optimise a campaign whose accepted-order rate nobody has counted, and to promise a cost per result before a month of measurement. A figure announced before the measurement is an estimate dressed as a commitment.

What we do: the objective chosen from what you sell; the price and the delivery time visible in the creative; comments handled in the same hours as messages; the page and the account in your name; and the cost per accepted order as the figure reported.

And what you should do without us this week: for seven days, count three things — messages received, how many waited more than an hour, and how many orders were accepted. A notebook is enough, and those three numbers will settle the campaign better than any targeting.

Frequently asked questions

Should we boost a post or create a campaign?

A campaign, as soon as the purpose is acquisition. The button optimises for reactions, which are bought from people who will not buy. Keep it for showing information to those who already follow you: an opening, an hour, an item out of stock.

What budget do we need to start?

The smallest amount that lets you run for seven days without interruption, because a campaign stopped on the third day has learned nothing. But the real prerequisite is not the budget: it is somebody answering within the hour during those days.

Do we need very precise targeting?

Rarely, in a market this size: a narrow audience exhausts itself in days and you pay to repeat yourself. Fine targeting keeps its point for a purely local business and for a re-engagement audience built on your own list.

What does a message or an order cost?

We quote no figure: no dated, checkable series exists for this market. The only cost that concerns you is computed in your own office — the budget divided by the accepted orders, not by the registered ones.

Should we answer negative comments under an ad?

Yes, and the answer is addressed to the next reader rather than to its author, with a checkable fact. Hide only insults and numbers left by competitors: hiding a genuine question costs more than the question.

Does the page have to be in our name?

Yes, with a company email address, and the ad account too. A page created from an employee’s personal account leaves with them, and what is lost is not the page but years of conversations and the account’s history.

Where we come in

Seven days of counting gives you three numbers. The third — orders actually accepted — is the one that decides, and the only one nobody records.

  • We read your three numbers together and name the floor that costs most.
  • We make what it costs and how long it takes visible on the image itself.
  • We open the comments under the advert, where the real questions get asked.

If your messages wait more than an hour during working hours, buy no advertising: you would be funding a queue.

Read next

Let us talk about your project

A free audit, no commitment: we look at your online presence and tell you what is holding it back.

We measure how this site is used with Google Analytics, to learn which pages actually help. You can stop that measurement at any time from the footer. Cookie policy